| Title |
Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated non‐falciparum or <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> malaria in endemic countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharine Abba, Amanda J Kirkham, Piero L Olliaro, Jonathan J Deeks, Sarah Donegan, Paul Garner, Yemisi Takwoingi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 396 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 18% |
| Researcher | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 17% |
| Unknown | 95 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 67 | 17% |
| Unknown | 115 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,231,367
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,681
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,493
of 362,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.