↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011628.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace Obeid, Giao Do, Lisa Kirby, Carolyn Hughes, Emilie Sbidian, Laurence Le Cleach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 213 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Master 22 10%
Other 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 89 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 95 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,992,644
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,515
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,379
of 482,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.