| Title |
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011703.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomas Pantoja, Blanca Peñaloza, Camilo Cid, Cristian A Herrera, Craig R Ramsay, Jemma Hudson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,454,189
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,457
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,392
of 446,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.