↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Respiratory muscle training in children and adults with neuromuscular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory muscle training in children and adults with neuromuscular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011711.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivanizia S Silva, Rafaela Pedrosa, Ingrid G Azevedo, Anne‐Marie Forbes, Guilherme AF Fregonezi, Mário ET Dourado Junior, Suzianne RH Lima, Gardenia MH Ferreira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 529 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 12%
Student > Master 57 11%
Researcher 40 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 5%
Student > Postgraduate 20 4%
Other 84 16%
Unknown 238 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 16%
Unspecified 20 4%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 255 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,838,748
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,593
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,336
of 351,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.