| Title |
Strategies to improve the implementation of healthy eating, physical activity and obesity prevention policies, practices or programmes within childcare services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011779.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke Wolfenden, Courtney Barnes, Jannah Jones, Meghan Finch, Rebecca J Wyse, Melanie Kingsland, Flora Tzelepis, Alice Grady, Rebecca K Hodder, Debbie Booth, Sze Lin Yoong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 12% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| South Africa | 5 | 10% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 28% |
| Scientists | 8 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 768 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 768 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 78 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 10% |
| Researcher | 54 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 151 | 20% |
| Unknown | 319 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 93 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 4% |
| Psychology | 26 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 3% |
| Other | 107 | 14% |
| Unknown | 342 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,200,297
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,462
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,769
of 482,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.