| Title |
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011786.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Choong Yi Fong, Wei Kang Lim, Limin Li, Nai Ming Lai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#20,015,055
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,601
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,592
of 421,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.