↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for intra‐operative pain relief during postpartum mini‐laparotomy tubal ligation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for intra‐operative pain relief during postpartum mini‐laparotomy tubal ligation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011807.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuthapong Werawatakul, Jen Sothornwit, Malinee Laopaiboon, Pisake Lumbiganon, Chumnan Kietpeerakool

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 12%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Professor 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 55 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 62 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,921,638
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,777
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,414
of 448,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.