↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluoride supplementation (with tablets, drops, lozenges or chewing gum) in pregnant women for preventing dental caries in the primary teeth of their children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
89 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
Title
Fluoride supplementation (with tablets, drops, lozenges or chewing gum) in pregnant women for preventing dental caries in the primary teeth of their children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011850.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rena Takahashi, Erika Ota, Keika Hoshi, Toru Naito, Yoshihiro Toyoshima, Hidemichi Yuasa, Rintaro Mori, Eishu Nango

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 370 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Researcher 24 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 60 16%
Unknown 166 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 9%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 174 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#504,185
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#885
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,782
of 338,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.