| Title |
Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011887.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenna Rdm Borges, Aline Bgs Fernandes, Jacilda Oliveira Dos Passos, Isabelle Ananda Oliveira Rego, Tania F Campos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 15% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 73 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 77 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,971,156
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,194
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,186
of 433,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.