| Title |
Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011964.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare Davenport, Nirmala Rai, Pawana Sharma, Jonathan J Deeks, Sarah Berhane, Sue Mallett, Pratyusha Saha, Rita Champaneria, Susan E Bayliss, Kym Ie Snell, Sudha Sundar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Grenada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,556,443
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,358
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,165
of 433,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.