↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

C‐reactive protein for diagnosing late‐onset infection in newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
189 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
C‐reactive protein for diagnosing late‐onset infection in newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012126.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Nicholas Meader, Jemma Cleminson, William McGuire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 189 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 14%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 90 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 100 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#298,199
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#505
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,545
of 447,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.