↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to improve mathematical performance for children with mathematical learning difficulties (MLD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to improve mathematical performance for children with mathematical learning difficulties (MLD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012130
Authors

Mairead Furlong, Fergal McLoughlin, Sinead McGilloway, David Geary

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Mathematics 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 36 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,994,682
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,613
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,792
of 314,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.