| Title |
Humidification of indoor air for preventing or reducing dryness symptoms or upper respiratory infections in educational settings and at the workplace
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012219.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katarzyna Byber, Thomas Radtke, Dan Norbäck, Christine Hitzke, David Imo, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Milo A Puhan, Holger Dressel, Margot Mutsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 73 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 79 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,060,628
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,330
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,776
of 518,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.