| Title |
Debulking hysterectomy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for FIGO stage (2019) IB3/II cervical cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012246.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manas Chakrabarti, Andy Nordin, Juneida Khodabocus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 38 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,257,608
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,975
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,103
of 422,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.