| Title |
Taxation of sugar‐sweetened beverages for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012319 |
| Authors |
Thomas L Heise, Srinivasa V Katikireddi, Frank Pega, Gerald Gartlehner, Candida Fenton, Ursula Griebler, Isolde Sommer, Manuela Pfinder, Stefan K Lhachimi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 17% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,151,361
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,502
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,856
of 354,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.