| Title |
Anterior versus posterior approach for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012365 |
| Authors |
Zhen‐kai Wu, Qing‐hua Zhao, Ji‐wei Tian, Yong‐bing Qian, Yi Zhou, Fan Yang, Li Zhao, Daniel E Porter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#23,065,269
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,808
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,708
of 331,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#267
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.