↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Follow‐up strategies for women with endometrial cancer after primary treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Follow‐up strategies for women with endometrial cancer after primary treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012386
Authors

Rabeea'h W Aslam, Llinos H Spencer, Kirstie L Pye, Simon Leeson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Psychology 3 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,374
of 326,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#229
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.