| Title |
Galactomannan detection in broncho‐alveolar lavage fluid for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012399.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koen de Heer, Marije G Gerritsen, Caroline E Visser, Mariska MG Leeflang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Thailand | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 49% |
| Scientists | 13 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 174 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,284,326
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,731
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,330
of 364,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.