↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012413.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Niranjan Thomas, Sivam Thanigainathan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Student > Master 10 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 86 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 91 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,451,352
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,128
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,654
of 453,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.