↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012414.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiannis A Philippou, Jae Hung Jung, Martin J Steggall, Stephen T O'Driscoll, Caitlin J Bakker, Joshua A Bodie, Philipp Dahm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 72 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 84 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,643,758
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,273
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,343
of 362,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.