↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the uptake of evidence‐based recommendations in acute stroke settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the uptake of evidence‐based recommendations in acute stroke settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012520
Authors

Julie A Luker, Julie Bernhardt, Ian D Graham, Sandy Middleton, Elizabeth A Lynch, Tharshanah Thayabaranathan, Louise Craig, Dominique A Cadilhac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 25%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 25%
Psychology 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,762,533
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,396
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,293
of 422,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.