| Title |
Interventions for the uptake of evidence‐based recommendations in acute stroke settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012520.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A Lynch, Lemma N Bulto, Heilok Cheng, Louise Craig, Julie A Luker, Kathleen L Bagot, Tharshanah Thayabaranathan, Heidi Janssen, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Middleton, Dominique A Cadilhac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 17% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,633,284
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,704
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,383
of 360,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.