↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: effects on child development in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
Title
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: effects on child development in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012613
Authors

Joe D Piper, Jaya Chandna, Elizabeth Allen, Kenneth Linkman, Oliver Cumming, Andrew J. Prendergast, Melissa J Gladstone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 273 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 14 5%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 94 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 12%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Environmental Science 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 103 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,003,494
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,005
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,285
of 323,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.