↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012646.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Gutierrez, Jose L Rodriguez, Diego Zamora-de La Cruz, Mariana Aracely Flores Pimentel, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Linda C Novak, Rene Cano Hidalgo, Federico Graue

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 37 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 44 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,361,279
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,745
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,449
of 477,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.