↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Band ligation versus no intervention for primary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Band ligation versus no intervention for primary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012673.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonam Vadera, Charles Wei Kit Yong, Lise Lotte Gluud, Marsha Y Morgan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Other 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 59 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 71 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,785,164
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,001
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,900
of 367,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.