↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Minimally invasive surgical techniques for kidney transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Minimally invasive surgical techniques for kidney transplantation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012698
Authors

Raphael Uwechue, Pankaj Chandak, Zubir Ahmed, Petrut Gogalniceanu, Nicos Kessaris, Nizam Mamode

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 20%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,300,853
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,907
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,708
of 326,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#196
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.