↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
50 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
564 Mendeley
Title
Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012701.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J Schofield‐Robinson, Sharon R Lewis, Andrew F Smith, Joanne McPeake, Phil Alderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 564 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 14%
Student > Bachelor 70 12%
Researcher 52 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 5%
Other 82 15%
Unknown 213 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 121 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 110 20%
Psychology 29 5%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Neuroscience 10 2%
Other 50 9%
Unknown 224 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,046,212
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,102
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,687
of 364,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.