| Title |
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012778.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Bamat, Julie Fierro, Amit Mukerji, Clyde J Wright, David Millar, Haresh Kirpalani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Japan | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 65 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,466,403
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,159
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,951
of 515,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.