| Title |
Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET‐CT for staging and re‐staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012806.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Dinnes, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Yemisi Takwoingi, Seau Tak Cheung, Paul Nathan, Rubeta N Matin, Naomi Chuchu, Sue Ann Chan, Alana Durack, Susan E Bayliss, Abha Gulati, Lopa Patel, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Manil Subesinghe, Zoe Traill, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 337 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Researcher | 40 | 12% |
| Other | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 113 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 129 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,915,082
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,208
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,818
of 364,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.