| Title |
Tranexamic acid for the reduction of bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012843.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evelijn Lourijsen, Klementina Avdeeva, Kit Liang Gan, Vishal Pundir, Wytske Fokkens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 33% |
| Thailand | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,379,214
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,110
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,909
of 428,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.