| Title |
Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012937.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Sivam Thanigainathan, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Balakrishnan Rajaiah, Srinivas Ramakrishnan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 18% |
| United States | 17 | 18% |
| Australia | 5 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Uganda | 2 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 22% |
| Scientists | 13 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#605,834
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,096
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,355
of 371,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.