| Title |
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013002.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Ni hIci, Henry Mp Boardman, Kamran Baig, Jody L Stafford, Cristina Cernei, Owen Bodger, Stephen Westaby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| Japan | 3 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 73 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 81 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,439,172
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,183
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,400
of 433,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.