| Title |
Nutrition‐specific interventions for preventing and controlling anaemia throughout the life cycle: an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013092.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharina da Silva Lopes, Noyuri Yamaji, Md Obaidur Rahman, Maiko Suto, Yo Takemoto, Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal, Erika Ota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 9% |
| South Africa | 3 | 9% |
| Peru | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 555 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 555 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 31 | 6% |
| Researcher | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 77 | 14% |
| Unknown | 308 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 28 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 48 | 9% |
| Unknown | 332 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,410,306
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,979
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,559
of 437,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.