| Title |
Pharmacist services for non‐hospitalised patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mícheál de Barra, Claire L Scott, Neil W Scott, Marie Johnston, Marijn de Bruin, Nancy Nkansah, Christine M Bond, Catriona I Matheson, Pamela Rackow, A. Jess Williams, Margaret C Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 22% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Oman | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 75% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 431 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Researcher | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 14% |
| Unknown | 154 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 59 | 14% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 158 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#670,788
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,184
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,068
of 346,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.