| Title |
Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013120.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Iogna Prat, Peter Wilson, Suzanne C Freeman, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Davide Roccarina, Amine Benmassaoud, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Neil Hawkins, Maxine Cowlin, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Douglas Thorburn, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 78 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,228,039
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,534
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,222
of 338,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.