| Title |
Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013121.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Roccarina, Lawrence Mj Best, Suzanne C Freeman, Danielle Roberts, Nicola J Cooper, Alex J Sutton, Amine Benmassaoud, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Laura Iogna Prat, Mario Csenar, Sivapatham Arunan, Tanjia Begum, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Maxine Tapp, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Norman R Williams, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,121,962
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,695
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,261
of 456,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.