↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM‐ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM‐ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013126
Authors

Fabian Miranda, Ingrid Arevalo‐Rodriguez, Gonzalo Díaz, Francisco Gonzalez, Maria N Plana, Javier Zamora, Terry J Quinn, Pamela Seron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 51 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 54 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#22,963,239
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,815
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,901
of 348,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.