| Title |
Systemic interventions for treatment of Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013130.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Audrey Jacobsen, Bayanne Olabi, Annie Langley, Jennifer Beecker, Eric Mutter, Amanda Shelley, Brandon Worley, Timothy Ramsay, Arturo Saavedra, Roses Parker, Fiona Stewart, Jordi Pardo Pardo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| France | 3 | 20% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| Namibia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 67 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,419,447
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,894
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,951
of 448,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.