| Title |
Transverse versus vertical groin incision for femoral artery approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013153.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcus Canteras, Jose Cc Baptista-Silva, Frederico do Carmo Novaes, Daniel G Cacione |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 58 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 68 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,813,819
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,103
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,153
of 404,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.