↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

General versus loco‐regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
General versus loco‐regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013182.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Lee, Carolyne You, Andrew Kucey, Fahad Alam, Giuseppe Papia, Daryl S Kucey, Thomas Forbes, Stephen Choi, Andrew D Dueck, Ahmed Kayssi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,955,550
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,237
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,390
of 421,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.