| Title |
Anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor therapy for glioblastoma in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013238.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Lee, Malmaruha Arasaratnam, David Lok Hang Chan, Mustafa Khasraw, Viive M Howell, Helen Wheeler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 92 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 96 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,621,995
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,759
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,417
of 420,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.