| Title |
Animal‐assisted therapy for dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013243.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nai Ming Lai, Sharon Mei Wern Chang, Siok Shen Ng, Shir Ley Tan, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Fiona Stanaway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 27% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 481 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 481 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 8% |
| Researcher | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 64 | 13% |
| Unknown | 210 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 14% |
| Psychology | 43 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 57 | 12% |
| Unknown | 221 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,011,940
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,999
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,064
of 480,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.