| Title |
Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013259.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Jl Molenaar, Stefan J van Rooijen, Hugo Jp Fokkenrood, Rudi Mh Roumen, Loes Janssen, Gerrit D Slooter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 8% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 84 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 91 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,257,706
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,613
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,918
of 446,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.