| Title |
Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013267.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jichang Luo, Tao Wang, Kun Yang, Xue Wang, Ran Xu, Haozhi Gong, Xiao Zhang, Jie Wang, Renjie Yang, Peng Gao, Yan Ma, Liqun Jiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,360,206
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,890
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,698
of 475,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.