| Title |
Consumers and health providers working in partnership for the promotion of person‐centred health services: a co‐produced qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013274 |
| Authors |
Bronwen Merner, Sophie Hill, Cinzia Colombo, Vicki Xafis, Carolyn M Gaulden, Lisa Graham‐Wisener, Dianne Lowe, Louisa Walsh, Susan Biggar, Noni Bourke, Renee Chmielewski, Marie Gill, Fiona Martin, Nathalie Martinek, Louise McKinlay, David Menzies, Anne Mussared, Nora Refahi, Lorraine Smith, Roshni Sonawane, Cheryl Wardrope |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 24% |
| Australia | 9 | 22% |
| Singapore | 3 | 7% |
| Ireland | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 61% |
| Scientists | 14 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Design | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,558,711
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,295
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,557
of 368,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.