| Title |
Behavioural activation therapy for depression in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013305.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleonora Uphoff, David Ekers, Lindsay Robertson, Sarah Dawson, Emily Sanger, Emily South, Zainab Samaan, David Richards, Nicholas Meader, Rachel Churchill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 25% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 16% |
| Scientists | 8 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 390 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 10% |
| Researcher | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 13% |
| Unknown | 161 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 72 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Unknown | 174 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#294,848
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#492
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,391
of 432,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.