| Title |
Low‐carbohydrate versus balanced‐carbohydrate diets for reducing weight and cardiovascular risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013334.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Celeste E Naude, Amanda Brand, Anel Schoonees, Kim A Nguyen, Marty Chaplin, Jimmy Volmink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 407 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 11% |
| Spain | 27 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 6% |
| Canada | 16 | 4% |
| Japan | 14 | 3% |
| Germany | 13 | 3% |
| India | 10 | 2% |
| Colombia | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 78 | 19% |
| Unknown | 161 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 277 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 83 | 20% |
| Scientists | 44 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 148 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 154 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 624. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#36,262
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,336
of 520,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.