↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013357
Authors

Qingling Jiang, Junjie Chen, Zhenmi Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Psychology 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#22,835,295
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,090
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,647
of 367,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.