↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diagnostic test accuracy and cost‐effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost‐effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013387
Authors

Alexandra McAleenan, Hayley E Jones, Ashleigh Kernohan, Claire L Faulkner, Abigail Palmer, Sarah Dawson, Christopher Wragg, Sarah Jefferies, Sebastian Brandner, Luke Vale, Julian P T Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,591,899
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,105
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,792
of 359,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.