| Title |
Comparison of different human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine types and dose schedules for prevention of HPV‐related disease in females and males
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013479 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanna Bergman, Brian S Buckley, Gemma Villanueva, Jennifer Petkovic, Chantelle Garritty, Vittoria Lutje, Alina Ximena Riveros‐Balta, Nicola Low, Nicholas Henschke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| Mexico | 5 | 5% |
| Japan | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 89 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 598 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 598 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 11% |
| Researcher | 61 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 90 | 15% |
| Unknown | 248 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 70 | 12% |
| Unknown | 270 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#233,676
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#391
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,354
of 477,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.